Effectiveness of Reading Strategies for EFL students of Pre-Intermediate Level

Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 04 Мая 2012 в 09:33, дипломная работа

Краткое описание

The paper presents the topic Effectiveness of Reading Strategies for EFL students of Pre-Intermediate Level. The purpose of the research is to identify the most effective reading strategy that can help enhance students’ reading comprehension. For this aim there were taken six particular strategies offered by different authors. In order to achieve the primary purpose of the qualification paper there were held experiments for each strategy with the group of second year students of English Philology Department of Uzbek State World Languages University, in number of 10. After each experiment there was a diagnostic test results of which were compared with other ones at the end of the research. The tables and formulas were used to illustrate and analyze the results of the survey. The Research Plan was coherently followed. The purpose of the research was successfully reached.

Оглавление

ABSTRACT……………………………………………….3
I. STATEMENT OF INTENT………………………....4
II. LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………5
III. PROCEDURES AND PROCESS
RESEARCH PLAN…………………………..13
STATEMENT OF THE PURPOSE
METHOD
PROCEDURE
ANALYSIS
DATA COLLECTION……………………….19
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………25
1) RESULTS
2) DISCUSSION
V. FINAL REFLECTIONS…………………………….40
VI. REFERENCE LIST…………………………………42
VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………..43
APPENDIX……………………………………………….47
Appendix 1 (Questionnaire)………………………….......
Appendix 2 (Reading Proficiency Test)……………….....
Appendix 3 (Reading Handouts)…………………………
Appendix 4 (Diagnostic Tests)…………………………..

Файлы: 1 файл

diplom.doc

— 7.44 Мб (Скачать)

         (45+40+40+30+30+25+25+25+25+20)/10= 30, 5

         Mode is the numerical value that occurs most frequently in a set of numerical values. From the Table №3 it is obvious that mode is 25.

         Median is the value at the center of the range of the set. In order to find median the researcher found the middle score 30 and that is median.

Mean 30, 5
Mode 25
Median 30

          The next step for a statistical study is dispersion. Dispersion focuses on the behavior or performance of the individuals in the groups. There are two indicators of individual behavior: range and standard deviation.

         Range is the number of points between the Highest and lowest score in the set, plus one. To make this calculation the researcher used the following formula:

         x= (highest score – lowest score + 1)

         (45-20+1)= 26

         Standard deviation is the average of the differences of all scores from the mean. The following formula is used to calculate the standard deviation for a set of scores:

         SD =

         To calculate SD, it is necessary to subtract the mean from each score in the set, then squire each of these values and add them up. Divide the total by the number of scores, and then, square root of that total to get the standard deviation.

         Table №4

Name Score Mean Difference Difference Squared
Muazzam 45 - 30, 5 14,5 210.25
Nilufar 40 - 30, 5 9,5 90.25
Suhrob 40 - 30, 5 9,5 90.25
Nasiba 30 - 30, 5 -0,5 0.25
Hilola 30 - 30, 5 -0,5 0.25
Odina 25 - 30, 5 -5,5 30.25
Zarnigor 25 - 30, 5 -5,5 30.25
Lobar 25 - 30, 5 -5,5 30.25
Gulbahor 25 - 30, 5 -5,5 30.25
Nargiza 20 - 30, 5 -10,5 110.25

         SD= =

          = 7.9

         As it is seen above the standard deviation for diagnostic test 1 is 7.9.

         The same calculation the researcher made with the scores of the following 4 diagnostic tests.

         The diagnostic test 2 was on Think-Aloud strategy. There were two tasks: Matching and short answer questions. The total score was 60 points. The results you can see in the table №5.

         Table №5, Results of Diagnostic Test 2, Think-Aloud strategy 

Name Score
Muazzam 30
Nilufar 40
Suhrob 40
Nasiba 45
Hilola 35
Odina 30
Zarnigor 30
Lobar 30
Gulbahor 25
Nargiza 50

          The results of the test were not so bad, they were even good enough. The next Table presents the frequency distribution. 
 

         Table №6 Frequency Distribution for Diagnostic test 2 

Score Value Frequency
50 1
45 1
40 2
35 1
30 4
25 1

 

                The most frequent score is:

         “30”-4

         Mean:

         (50+45+40+40+35+30+30+30+30+25)/10= 35.5

         Mode is 30.

         Median:

         (35+30)/2= 32.5

Mean 35.5
Mode 30
Median 32.5

 

         According to the formula range is:

         x= (highest score- lowest score+1)

         50-25+1=26

         Standard deviation is calculated by the same formula:

         SD=  

         Table №7 Standard deviation for Diagnostic test 2

Name Score Mean Difference Difference Squared
Muazzam 30 -35.5 -5.5 30.25
Nilufar 40 -35.5 4.5 20.25
Suhrob 40 -35.5 4.5 20.25
Nasiba 45 -35.5 9.5 90.25
Hilola 35 -35.5 -0.5 0.25
Odina 30 -35.5 -5.5 30.25
Zarnigor 30 -35.5 -5.5 30.25
Lobar 30 -35.5 -5.5 30.25
Gulbahor 25 -35.5 -10.5 110.25
Nargiza 50 -35.5 14.5 210.25

         SD= = = 7.5

         So, Standard deviation is 7.5.

         The third test was on Questioning Practice strategy, it was the most successful one. The table №8 shows the results of the Diagnostic test 3.

         Table №8, The Results of The Diagnostic test 3 

Name Score
Muazzam 55
Nilufar 60
Suhrob 50
Nasiba 60
Hilola 55
Odina 45
Zarnigor 40
Lobar 45
Gulbahor 55
Nargiza 40

 

         Table №9 Frequency Distribution for Diagnostic test 3

Score Value Frequency
60 2
55 3
50 1
45 2
40 2

 

                The most frequent score is:

         “55”- 3

         The mean of the diagnostic test 3 is:

         (55+60+50+60+55+45+40+45+55+40)/10= 50.5

         Mode is 55

         Median is (55+50)/2=52.5

Mean 50.5
Mode 55
Median 52.5

 

         The Range is: x= (highest score-lowest score+1)

         60-40+1=21 
 
 

         Table №10

Name Score Mean Difference Difference Squared
Muazzam 55 -50.5 4.5 20.25
Nilufar 60 -50.5 9.5 90.25
Suhrob 50 -50.5 -0.5 0.25
Nasiba 60 -50.5 9.5 90.25
Hilola 55 -50.5 4.5 20.25
Odina 45 -50.5 -5.5 30.25
Zarnigor 40 -50.5 -10.5 110.25
Lobar 45 -50.5 -5.5 30.25
Gulbahor 55 -50.5 4.5 20.25
Nargiza 40 -50.5 -10.5 110.25

         SD =

         SD = = =7.2

         The fourth strategy was Retelling Practices. The learners had to write an essay and the results were rather good. They are presented in the Table №11.

         Table №11, The Results of The Diagnostic test 4

Name Score
Muazzam 55
Nilufar 45
Suhrob 50
Nasiba 60
Hilola 50
Odina 45
Zarnigor 40
Lobar 45
Gulbahor 55
Nargiza 40

 

         Table №12, Frequency Distribution for Diagnostic test 4

Score Value Frequency
60 1
55 2
50 2
45 3
40 2

 

The most frequent score is:

         “45”- 3

         The mean of the diagnostic test 4 is:

         (55+45+50+60+50+45+40+45+55+40)/10= 48.5

         Mode is 45

         Median is (50+45)/2=47.5

Mean 48.5
Mode 45
Median 47.5

 

         The Range is: x= (highest score-lowest score+1)

         60-40+1=21 
 
 

         Table №13

Name Score Mean Difference Difference Squared
Muazzam 55 -48.5 6.5 42.25
Nilufar 45 -48.5 -3.5 12.25
Suhrob 50 -48.5 1.5 2.25
Nasiba 60 -48.5 11.5 132.25
Hilola 50 -48.5 1.5 2.25
Odina 45 -48.5 -3.5 12.25
Zarnigor 40 -48.5 -8.5 72.25
Lobar 45 -48.5 -3.5 12.25
Gulbahor 55 -48.5 6.5 42.25
Nargiza 40 -48.5 -8.5 72.25

Информация о работе Effectiveness of Reading Strategies for EFL students of Pre-Intermediate Level