Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 04 Мая 2012 в 09:33, дипломная работа
The paper presents the topic Effectiveness of Reading Strategies for EFL students of Pre-Intermediate Level. The purpose of the research is to identify the most effective reading strategy that can help enhance students’ reading comprehension. For this aim there were taken six particular strategies offered by different authors. In order to achieve the primary purpose of the qualification paper there were held experiments for each strategy with the group of second year students of English Philology Department of Uzbek State World Languages University, in number of 10. After each experiment there was a diagnostic test results of which were compared with other ones at the end of the research. The tables and formulas were used to illustrate and analyze the results of the survey. The Research Plan was coherently followed. The purpose of the research was successfully reached.
ABSTRACT……………………………………………….3
I. STATEMENT OF INTENT………………………....4
II. LITERATURE REVIEW……………………………5
III. PROCEDURES AND PROCESS
RESEARCH PLAN…………………………..13
STATEMENT OF THE PURPOSE
METHOD
PROCEDURE
ANALYSIS
DATA COLLECTION……………………….19
IV. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION……………………25
1) RESULTS
2) DISCUSSION
V. FINAL REFLECTIONS…………………………….40
VI. REFERENCE LIST…………………………………42
VII. BIBLIOGRAPHY…………………………………..43
APPENDIX……………………………………………….47
Appendix 1 (Questionnaire)………………………….......
Appendix 2 (Reading Proficiency Test)……………….....
Appendix 3 (Reading Handouts)…………………………
Appendix 4 (Diagnostic Tests)…………………………..
(45+40+40+30+30+25+
Mode is the numerical value that occurs most frequently in a set of numerical values. From the Table №3 it is obvious that mode is 25.
Median is the value at the center of the range of the set. In order to find median the researcher found the middle score 30 and that is median.
Mean | 30, 5 |
Mode | 25 |
Median | 30 |
The next step for a statistical study is dispersion. Dispersion focuses on the behavior or performance of the individuals in the groups. There are two indicators of individual behavior: range and standard deviation.
Range is the number of points between the Highest and lowest score in the set, plus one. To make this calculation the researcher used the following formula:
x= (highest score – lowest score + 1)
(45-20+1)= 26
Standard deviation is the average of the differences of all scores from the mean. The following formula is used to calculate the standard deviation for a set of scores:
SD =
To calculate SD, it is necessary to subtract the mean from each score in the set, then squire each of these values and add them up. Divide the total by the number of scores, and then, square root of that total to get the standard deviation.
Table №4
Name | Score | Mean | Difference | Difference Squared |
Muazzam | 45 | - 30, 5 | 14,5 | 210.25 |
Nilufar | 40 | - 30, 5 | 9,5 | 90.25 |
Suhrob | 40 | - 30, 5 | 9,5 | 90.25 |
Nasiba | 30 | - 30, 5 | -0,5 | 0.25 |
Hilola | 30 | - 30, 5 | -0,5 | 0.25 |
Odina | 25 | - 30, 5 | -5,5 | 30.25 |
Zarnigor | 25 | - 30, 5 | -5,5 | 30.25 |
Lobar | 25 | - 30, 5 | -5,5 | 30.25 |
Gulbahor | 25 | - 30, 5 | -5,5 | 30.25 |
Nargiza | 20 | - 30, 5 | -10,5 | 110.25 |
SD= =
= 7.9
As it is seen above the standard deviation for diagnostic test 1 is 7.9.
The same calculation the researcher made with the scores of the following 4 diagnostic tests.
The diagnostic test 2 was on Think-Aloud strategy. There were two tasks: Matching and short answer questions. The total score was 60 points. The results you can see in the table №5.
Table
№5, Results of Diagnostic Test 2, Think-Aloud strategy
Name | Score |
Muazzam | 30 |
Nilufar | 40 |
Suhrob | 40 |
Nasiba | 45 |
Hilola | 35 |
Odina | 30 |
Zarnigor | 30 |
Lobar | 30 |
Gulbahor | 25 |
Nargiza | 50 |
The results of the test were not so bad, they were even good enough.
The next Table presents the frequency distribution.
Table
№6 Frequency Distribution for Diagnostic test 2
Score Value | Frequency |
50 | 1 |
45 | 1 |
40 | 2 |
35 | 1 |
30 | 4 |
25 | 1 |
The most frequent score is:
“30”-4
Mean:
(50+45+40+40+35+30+
Mode is 30.
Median:
(35+30)/2= 32.5
Mean | 35.5 |
Mode | 30 |
Median | 32.5 |
According to the formula range is:
x= (highest score- lowest score+1)
50-25+1=26
Standard deviation is calculated by the same formula:
SD=
Table №7 Standard deviation for Diagnostic test 2
Name | Score | Mean | Difference | Difference Squared |
Muazzam | 30 | -35.5 | -5.5 | 30.25 |
Nilufar | 40 | -35.5 | 4.5 | 20.25 |
Suhrob | 40 | -35.5 | 4.5 | 20.25 |
Nasiba | 45 | -35.5 | 9.5 | 90.25 |
Hilola | 35 | -35.5 | -0.5 | 0.25 |
Odina | 30 | -35.5 | -5.5 | 30.25 |
Zarnigor | 30 | -35.5 | -5.5 | 30.25 |
Lobar | 30 | -35.5 | -5.5 | 30.25 |
Gulbahor | 25 | -35.5 | -10.5 | 110.25 |
Nargiza | 50 | -35.5 | 14.5 | 210.25 |
SD= = = 7.5
So, Standard deviation is 7.5.
The third test was on Questioning Practice strategy, it was the most successful one. The table №8 shows the results of the Diagnostic test 3.
Table
№8, The Results of The Diagnostic test 3
Name | Score |
Muazzam | 55 |
Nilufar | 60 |
Suhrob | 50 |
Nasiba | 60 |
Hilola | 55 |
Odina | 45 |
Zarnigor | 40 |
Lobar | 45 |
Gulbahor | 55 |
Nargiza | 40 |
Table №9 Frequency Distribution for Diagnostic test 3
Score Value | Frequency |
60 | 2 |
55 | 3 |
50 | 1 |
45 | 2 |
40 | 2 |
The most frequent score is:
“55”- 3
The mean of the diagnostic test 3 is:
(55+60+50+60+55+45+
Mode is 55
Median is (55+50)/2=52.5
Mean | 50.5 |
Mode | 55 |
Median | 52.5 |
The Range is: x= (highest score-lowest score+1)
60-40+1=21
Table №10
Name | Score | Mean | Difference | Difference Squared |
Muazzam | 55 | -50.5 | 4.5 | 20.25 |
Nilufar | 60 | -50.5 | 9.5 | 90.25 |
Suhrob | 50 | -50.5 | -0.5 | 0.25 |
Nasiba | 60 | -50.5 | 9.5 | 90.25 |
Hilola | 55 | -50.5 | 4.5 | 20.25 |
Odina | 45 | -50.5 | -5.5 | 30.25 |
Zarnigor | 40 | -50.5 | -10.5 | 110.25 |
Lobar | 45 | -50.5 | -5.5 | 30.25 |
Gulbahor | 55 | -50.5 | 4.5 | 20.25 |
Nargiza | 40 | -50.5 | -10.5 | 110.25 |
SD =
SD = = =7.2
The fourth strategy was Retelling Practices. The learners had to write an essay and the results were rather good. They are presented in the Table №11.
Table №11, The Results of The Diagnostic test 4
Name | Score |
Muazzam | 55 |
Nilufar | 45 |
Suhrob | 50 |
Nasiba | 60 |
Hilola | 50 |
Odina | 45 |
Zarnigor | 40 |
Lobar | 45 |
Gulbahor | 55 |
Nargiza | 40 |
Table №12, Frequency Distribution for Diagnostic test 4
Score Value | Frequency |
60 | 1 |
55 | 2 |
50 | 2 |
45 | 3 |
40 | 2 |
The most frequent score is:
“45”- 3
The mean of the diagnostic test 4 is:
(55+45+50+60+50+45+
Mode is 45
Median is (50+45)/2=47.5
Mean | 48.5 |
Mode | 45 |
Median | 47.5 |
The Range is: x= (highest score-lowest score+1)
60-40+1=21
Table №13
Name | Score | Mean | Difference | Difference Squared |
Muazzam | 55 | -48.5 | 6.5 | 42.25 |
Nilufar | 45 | -48.5 | -3.5 | 12.25 |
Suhrob | 50 | -48.5 | 1.5 | 2.25 |
Nasiba | 60 | -48.5 | 11.5 | 132.25 |
Hilola | 50 | -48.5 | 1.5 | 2.25 |
Odina | 45 | -48.5 | -3.5 | 12.25 |
Zarnigor | 40 | -48.5 | -8.5 | 72.25 |
Lobar | 45 | -48.5 | -3.5 | 12.25 |
Gulbahor | 55 | -48.5 | 6.5 | 42.25 |
Nargiza | 40 | -48.5 | -8.5 | 72.25 |
Информация о работе Effectiveness of Reading Strategies for EFL students of Pre-Intermediate Level