Автор: Пользователь скрыл имя, 17 Февраля 2013 в 15:32, курсовая работа
The goal of translation is to transform a text in the Source Language into a text in the Target Language. This means that the message produced by the translator should call forth a reaction from the TL receptor similar to that called forth by the original message from the SL receptor. The content, that is, the referential meaning of the message with all its implications and the form of the message with all its emotive and stylistic connotations must be reproduced as fully as possible in the translation as they are to evoke a similar response. While the content remains relatively intact, the form, that is, the linguistic signs of the original, may be substituted or replaced by other signs of the TL because of structural differences at all levels. Such substitutions are justified; they are functional and aim at achieving equivalence.
CHAPTER ONE
Some fundamentals of theory of translation……………………………….
Types of equivalence……………………………………………………….
First Type of Equivalence…………………………………………………..
Second Type of Equivalence……………………………………………….
Stylistic Aspect of Equivalence.............…………………………….
Pragmatic Aspect of Equivalence……………………………………
Third Type of Equivalence…………………………………………………
Levels of Equivalence………………………………………………………
Types of Translation……………………………………………………….
CHAPTER TWO
Grammatical Problems……………………………………………………..
Grammatical Features Typical of Modern English…………………………
Non-equivalents….........................................................................................
Partial Equivalents………………………………………………………….
The Infinitive……………………………………………………………….
The Participle as Part of an Absolute Construction…………………………
Free and Bound Use of Grammatical Forms……………………………….
Types of Grammatical Transformations……………………………………
Transpositions……………………………………………………………….
Replacements………………………………………………………………
Additions……………………………………………………………………
Omissions……………………………………………………………………
CHAPTER THREE
Lexical Problems…………………………………………………………...
Three Types of Lexical meaning……………………………………………
Referential meaning and its Rendering in Translation……………………...
Divergences in the Semantic Structure of words…………………………...
Different Valency…………………………………………………………...
Different Usage……………………………………………………………...
Translation of Monosemantic Words……………………..............................
Rendering of Proper Names in Translation………………………………….
Geographical Names…………………………………………………
Names of Months, Seasons and Days of the Week………………….
Numerals……………………………………………………………..
Names of Street……………………………………………………....
Names of Hotels……...………………………………………….…...
Names of Sports and Games…………………………………………
Names of Periodicals………………………………………………...
Names of Institutions and Organizations…………………………….
Translation of Polysemantic Words…………………………………….…..
Contextual Meaning of Polysemantic Words………………………….…...
Words of Wide Meaning………………………………………………..…..
Translation of Pseudo-International Words………………………………..
Non-equivalents……………………………………………………………
Translation of Words of Emotive meaning……………………….………..
Rendering of Stylistic Meaning in Translation………………………….….
Translation of Phraseological Units………………………………………..
Concretization……………………………………………………………...
Generalization……………………………………………………………...
Antonymic Translation…………………………………………………….
Metonymic Translation…………………………………………………….
Paraphrasing………………………………………………………………..
CHAPTER FOUR
Stylistic Problems…………………………………………………………..
Official style…………………………………………………………….….
Scientific Prose Style……………………………………………………..…
Newspaper and Publicistic Styles……………………………………….….
Rendering of Form in Translating Emotive Prose…………………….……
National Character of Stylistic Systems…………………………….……...
Rendering of Trite and Original Devices……………………………..…….
Original Metaphors and Their Translation…………………………….…...
Transferred Epithet and its Translation………………………………..……
Violation of Phraseological Units and its Rendering……………………….
Foregrounding and Translation……………………………………………..
Foregrounding of Articles……………………………………………….….
Degrees of Comparison…………………………………………………..…
The Plural Form…………………………………………………………….
Word Building...………………………………………………………….....
Suffixes……………………………………………………………………..
Conversation and Foregrounding…………………………………………..
Emphatic Constructions…………………………………………………..…
Inversion as a Means of Emphasis……………………………………….…
Emphatic Use of the “As…as” Model………………………………….…..
Emphatic Negative Constructions……………………………………..……
Semantic Foregrounding………………………………………
Я высказываю предположение, мистер Спикер, что правительство и Министерство по делам гражданства и эмиграции все еще упорно цепляются за принцип XIX века.
The unusual combination “collective feet” cannot be preserved in Russian (коллективные ноги would be unacceptable) and only the semantic aspect of the combination is rendered in the translation.
Stylistic means and devices present considerable and varied problems for translation. They possess a distinct national character although at first sight they may appear to be identical. Foreground linguistic means give rise to particularly hard problems as specific national language means are brought into play by foregrounding, e.g. articles, suffixes, the passive voice, conversion, etc.
The translator must be fully aware of the function of a stylistic device and its effect, to be able to reproduce the same effect by other means, if necessary, thus minimizing the inevitable losses due to inherent divergences.
To conclude: stylistic equivalence may be achieved by different means and not necessary by the same device.